PyPi: Urllib3

CVE-2023-45803

Safety vulnerability ID: 61893

This vulnerability was reviewed by experts

The information on this page was manually curated by our Cybersecurity Intelligence Team.

Created at Oct 17, 2023 Updated at Mar 29, 2024
Scan your Python projects for vulnerabilities →

Advisory

Urllib3 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2023-45803: Request body not stripped after redirect from 303 status changes request method to GET.
https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4

Affected package

urllib3

Latest version: 2.2.1

HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.

Affected versions

Fixed versions

Vulnerability changelog

urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren't expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False` and disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body. See CVE-2023-45803.


MISC:https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/4e98d57809dacab1cbe625fddeec1a290c478ea9: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/4e98d57809dacab1cbe625fddeec1a290c478ea9
MISC:https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4
MISC:https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-get: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-get

Resources

Use this package?

Scan your Python project for dependency vulnerabilities in two minutes

Scan your application

Severity Details

CVSS Base Score

MEDIUM 4.2

CVSS v3 Details

MEDIUM 4.2
Attack Vector (AV)
ADJACENT_NETWORK
Attack Complexity (AC)
HIGH
Privileges Required (PR)
HIGH
User Interaction (UI)
NONE
Scope (S)
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact (C)
HIGH
Integrity Impact (I)
NONE
Availability Availability (A)
NONE