Safety vulnerability ID: 37656
The information on this page was manually curated by our Cybersecurity Intelligence Team.
Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.
Latest version: 5.0.4
A high-level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
==========================
*December 2, 2019*
Django 2.2.8 fixes a security issue, several bugs in 2.2.7, and adds
compatibility with Python 3.8.
CVE-2019-19118: Privilege escalation in the Django admin.
=========================================================
Since Django 2.1, a Django model admin displaying a parent model with related
model inlines, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but
edit permissions to the inline model, would display a read-only view of the
parent model but editable forms for the inline.
Submitting these forms would not allow direct edits to the parent model, but
would trigger the parent model's ``save()`` method, and cause pre and post-save
signal handlers to be invoked. This is a privilege escalation as a user who
lacks permission to edit a model should not be able to trigger its save-related
signals.
To resolve this issue, the permission handling code of the Django admin
interface has been changed. Now, if a user has only the "view" permission for a
parent model, the entire displayed form will not be editable, even if the user
has permission to edit models included in inlines.
This is a backwards-incompatible change, and the Django security team is aware
that some users of Django were depending on the ability to allow editing of
inlines in the admin form of an otherwise view-only parent model.
Given the complexity of the Django admin, and in-particular the permissions
related checks, it is the view of the Django security team that this change was
necessary: that it is not currently feasible to maintain the existing behavior
whilst escaping the potential privilege escalation in a way that would avoid a
recurrence of similar issues in the future, and that would be compatible with
Django's *safe by default* philosophy.
For the time being, developers whose applications are affected by this change
should replace the use of inlines in read-only parents with custom forms and
views that explicitly implement the desired functionality. In the longer term,
adding a documented, supported, and properly-tested mechanism for
partially-editable multi-model forms to the admin interface may occur in Django
itself.
Bugfixes
========
* Fixed a data loss possibility in the admin changelist view when a custom
:ref:`formset's prefix <formset-prefix>` contains regular expression special
characters, e.g. `'$'` (:ticket:`31031`).
* Fixed a regression in Django 2.2.1 that caused a crash when migrating
permissions for proxy models with a multiple database setup if the
``default`` entry was empty (:ticket:`31021`).
* Fixed a data loss possibility in the
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.select_for_update()`. When using
``'self'`` in the ``of`` argument with :ref:`multi-table inheritance
<multi-table-inheritance>`, a parent model was locked instead of the
queryset's model (:ticket:`30953`).
==========================
Scan your Python project for dependency vulnerabilities in two minutes
Scan your application