Safety CI > tiagocordeiro/flask-lme-chart

pyup-update-sqlalchemy-1.4.22-to-2.0.24

1 year, 7 months ago

56140bb8

Update sqlalchemy from 1.4.22 to 2.0.24

Flask 2.0.1 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

pyup-update-coverage-5.5-to-7.4.0

1 year, 7 months ago

e13a0c85

Update coverage from 5.5 to 7.4.0

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-coverage-5.5-to-7.3.4

1 year, 8 months ago

d74a9406

Update coverage from 5.5 to 7.3.4

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-coverage-5.5-to-7.3.3

1 year, 8 months ago

7b8f3544

Update coverage from 5.5 to 7.3.3

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-sqlalchemy-1.4.22-to-2.0.23

1 year, 9 months ago

677ee447

Update sqlalchemy from 1.4.22 to 2.0.23

Flask 2.0.1 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

pyup-update-pytest-flask-1.2.0-to-1.3.0

1 year, 10 months ago

8d8379f0

Update pytest-flask from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-sqlalchemy-1.4.22-to-2.0.22

1 year, 10 months ago

54b2daee

Update sqlalchemy from 1.4.22 to 2.0.22

Flask 2.0.1 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

pyup-update-pycodestyle-2.7.0-to-2.11.1

1 year, 10 months ago

817a04ff

Update pycodestyle from 2.7.0 to 2.11.1

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-psycopg2-binary-2.9.1-to-2.9.9

1 year, 10 months ago

b9b91fc8

Update psycopg2-binary from 2.9.1 to 2.9.9

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-psycopg2-2.9.1-to-2.9.9

1 year, 10 months ago

2faa51bc

Update psycopg2 from 2.9.1 to 2.9.9

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-coverage-5.5-to-7.3.2

1 year, 10 months ago

b050104c

Update coverage from 5.5 to 7.3.2

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-flask-2.0.1-to-3.0.0

1 year, 10 months ago

ebe528ad

Update flask from 2.0.1 to 3.0.0

SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-psycopg2-binary-2.9.1-to-2.9.8

1 year, 10 months ago

0b9230e9

Update psycopg2-binary from 2.9.1 to 2.9.8

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-psycopg2-2.9.1-to-2.9.8

1 year, 10 months ago

5fb529de

Update psycopg2 from 2.9.1 to 2.9.8

Flask 2.0.1 and SQLAlchemy 1.4.22 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq
SQLAlchemy	1.4.22	<2.0.0b1	show Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints. https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

SQLAlchemy

1.4.22

<2.0.0b1

show

Sqlalchemy 2.0.0b1 avoids leaking cleartext passwords to the open for careless uses of str(engine.URL()) in logs and prints.
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/pull/8563

pyup-update-sqlalchemy-1.4.22-to-2.0.21

1 year, 11 months ago

b32dfd55

Update sqlalchemy from 1.4.22 to 2.0.21

Flask 2.0.1 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Flask	2.0.1	<3.1.1	show Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).
Flask	2.0.1	<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2	show Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met: 1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies. 2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True' 3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request. 4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default). 5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached. This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified. https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

Flask

2.0.1

<3.1.1

show

Affected versions of Flask (≤ 3.1.0) are vulnerable to incorrect fallback key configuration in session signing, leading to stale key usage instead of the intended current key. This flaw undermines session integrity, enabling remote attackers to forge or tamper with cookies via manipulated SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS parameters. The vulnerability exists in the itsdangerous-based signing routines within flask.sessions (fallback key list ordering).

Flask

2.0.1

<2.2.5 , >=2.3.0,<2.3.2

show

Flask 2.2.5 and 2.3.2 include a fix for CVE-2023-30861: When all of the following conditions are met, a response containing data intended for one client may be cached and subsequently sent by the proxy to other clients. If the proxy also caches 'Set-Cookie' headers, it may send one client's 'session' cookie to other clients. The severity depends on the application's use of the session and the proxy's behavior regarding cookies. The risk depends on all these conditions being met:
1. The application must be hosted behind a caching proxy that does not strip cookies or ignore responses with cookies.
2. The application sets 'session.permanent = True'
3. The application does not access or modify the session at any point during a request.
4. 'SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST' enabled (the default).
5. The application does not set a 'Cache-Control' header to indicate that a page is private or should not be cached.
This happens because vulnerable versions of Flask only set the 'Vary: Cookie' header when the session is accessed or modified, not when it is refreshed (re-sent to update the expiration) without being accessed or modified.
https://github.com/pallets/flask/security/advisories/GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq