Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches.

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html

Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.

Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.

Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code.
https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.

Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.