Safety CI > hzlmn/aiohttp-jwt

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

Update coverage from 4.5.2 to 7.2.7

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

7b3f83d4

Update chardet from 3.0.4 to 5.1.0

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

123896ac

Update attrs from 18.2.0 to 23.1.0

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

1aef3f6a

Update atomicwrites from 1.3.0 to 1.4.1

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

069fbc4d

Update async-timeout from 3.0.1 to 4.0.2

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-24

2 years, 9 months ago

25feefd5

Update aiohttp from 3.5.4 to 3.8.5

py 1.8.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.8.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
py	1.8.0	<=1.9.0	show Py 1.10.0 includes a fix for CVE-2020-29651: A denial of service via regular expression in the py.path.svnwc component of py (aka python-py) through 1.9.0 could be used by attackers to cause a compute-time denial of service attack by supplying malicious input to the blame functionality.
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

669767c0

Update yarl from 1.3.0 to 1.9.2

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

068fdca9

Update six from 1.12.0 to 1.16.0

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

62042ba4

Update pytest-mock from 1.10.1 to 3.11.1

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

fcc3d335

Update pytest-cov from 2.6.1 to 4.1.0

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

a9a8e624

Update pytest-aiohttp from 0.3.0 to 1.0.4

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

0339839b

Update pytest from 4.3.0 to 7.4.0

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

ac290f21

Update pyjwt from 1.7.1 to 2.7.0

py 1.11.0 has known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

ca5fe9cf

Update pyflakes from 2.1.0 to 3.0.1

py 1.11.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

PyJWT

1.7.1

>=1.0.0,<2.4.0

show

PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.

PyJWT

1.7.1

<2.12.0

show

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

pyup-scheduled-update-2023-07-17

2 years, 9 months ago

beac16a0

Update py from 1.8.0 to 1.11.0

py 1.11.0 and PyJWT 1.7.1 have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
py	1.11.0	<=1.11.0	show DISPUTED Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled. https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287
PyJWT	1.7.1	>=1.0.0,<2.4.0	show PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.
PyJWT	1.7.1	<2.12.0	show Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.

Package

Installed

Affected

Info

py

1.11.0

<=1.11.0

show

** DISPUTED ** Py throughout 1.11.0 allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository with crafted info data because the InfoSvnCommand argument is mishandled.
https://github.com/pytest-dev/py/issues/287

PyJWT

1.7.1

>=1.0.0,<2.4.0

show

PyJWT 2.4.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-29217: An attacker submitting the JWT token can choose the used signing algorithm. The PyJWT library requires that the application chooses what algorithms are supported. The application can specify 'jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' to get support for all algorithms, or specify a single algorithm. The issue is not that big as 'algorithms=jwt.algorithms.get_default_algorithms()' has to be used. As a workaround, always be explicit with the algorithms that are accepted and expected when decoding.

PyJWT

1.7.1

<2.12.0

show

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. The library does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter as required by RFC 7515 §4.1.11 — when a JWT contains a `crit` array listing extensions that the library does not understand, the token is accepted instead of rejected. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting JWTs with unknown critical extensions (e.g., MFA requirements, token binding, scope restrictions) that are silently ignored, potentially bypassing security policies or causing split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments where other RFC-compliant libraries would reject the same token.