pyup-update-urllib3-1.25.3-to-1.26.13
2 years, 9 months ago
Update urllib3 from 1.25.3 to 1.26.13
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-pylint-2.3.1-to-2.15.6
2 years, 9 months ago
Update pylint from 2.3.1 to 2.15.6
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-simplejson-3.16.0-to-3.18.0
2 years, 10 months ago
Update simplejson from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-sentry-sdk-0.8.0-to-1.11.0
2 years, 10 months ago
Update sentry-sdk from 0.8.0 to 1.11.0
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-mkdocs-1.0.4-to-1.4.2
2 years, 10 months ago
Update mkdocs from 1.0.4 to 1.4.2
Django 2.2.1, pylint 2.3.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-django-2.2.1-to-4.1.3
2 years, 10 months ago
Update django from 2.2.1 to 4.1.3
mkdocs 1.0.4, pylint 2.3.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-pytz-2019.1-to-2022.6
2 years, 10 months ago
Update pytz from 2019.1 to 2022.6
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-pylint-2.3.1-to-2.15.5
2 years, 10 months ago
Update pylint from 2.3.1 to 2.15.5
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-sentry-sdk-0.8.0-to-1.10.1
2 years, 10 months ago
Update sentry-sdk from 0.8.0 to 1.10.1
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-sentry-sdk-0.8.0-to-1.10.0
2 years, 10 months ago
Update sentry-sdk from 0.8.0 to 1.10.0
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-pytz-2019.1-to-2022.5
2 years, 10 months ago
Update pytz from 2019.1 to 2022.5
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-oauthlib-3.0.1-to-3.2.2
2 years, 10 months ago
Update oauthlib from 3.0.1 to 3.2.2
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-mkdocs-1.0.4-to-1.4.1
2 years, 11 months ago
Update mkdocs from 1.0.4 to 1.4.1
Django 2.2.1, pylint 2.3.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-pylint-2.3.1-to-2.15.4
2 years, 11 months ago
Update pylint from 2.3.1 to 2.15.4
Django 2.2.1, mkdocs 1.0.4 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.24 |
show Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to SQL Injection due to insufficient input sanitization in FilteredRelation column aliases. The FilteredRelation class fails to properly validate or escape column alias names when they are provided through dictionary expansion as keyword arguments to QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias() methods, allowing malicious SQL code to be injected directly into the generated database queries. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.2.18 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.12 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.6 |
show Django 2.2.18, 3.0.12 and 3.1.6 include a fix for CVE-2021-3281: The django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.21 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django 1.11.21, 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a fix for CVE-2019-12308: The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, a non validated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6 |
show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6 |
show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7 |
show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.28 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.10 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.3 |
show Django 1.11.28, 2.2.10 and 3.0.3 include a fix for CVE-2020-7471: SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.1.9 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.2 |
show Django versions 2.1.9 and 2.2.2 include a patched bundled jQuery version to avoid a Prototype Pollution vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14 |
show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4 |
show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.7 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.13 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. Query parameters generated by the Django admin ForeignKeyRawIdWidget were not properly URL encoded, leading to a possibility of an XSS attack. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1 |
show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 includes a fix for CVE-2019-14235: If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2 |
show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24 |
show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14234: Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.23 , >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11, and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14233: Due to the behavior of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri(). |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.27 , >=2.0a1,<2.2.9 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.1 |
show Django 1.11.27, 2.2.9 and 3.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2019-19844: Account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.2a1,<2.2.20 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.14 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.8 |
show In Django 2.2 before 2.2.20, 3.0 before 3.0.14, and 3.1 before 3.1.8, MultiPartParser allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. Built-in upload handlers were not affected by this vulnerability. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1 |
show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.11.22 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.3 , >=2.1a1,<2.1.10 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1 |
show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/ |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.1a1,<2.1.15 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.8 |
show Django 2.1.15 and 2.2.8 includes a fix for CVE-2019-19118: A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.2a1,<3.2.1 , <2.2.21 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.9 |
show Django 2.2.21, 3.1.9 and 3.2.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-31542: MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show Django 2.2.16, 3.0.10 and 3.1.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-24583: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS mode was not applied to intermediate-level directories created in the process of uploading files. It was also not applied to intermediate-level collected static directories when using the collectstatic management command. #NOTE: This vulnerability affects only users of Python versions above 3.7. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/sep/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2 |
show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.16 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.1 |
show An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.16, 3.0 before 3.0.10, and 3.1 before 3.1.1 (when Python 3.7+ is used). The intermediate-level directories of the filesystem cache had the system's standard umask rather than 0o077. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=2.0a1,<2.1.11 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.4 , <1.11.23 |
show Django 1.11.23, 2.1.11 and 2.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2019-14232: If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4 |
show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7 |
show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8 |
show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7 |
show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=1.11a1,<1.1.29 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.11 , >=3.0a1,<3.0.4 |
show Django 1.11.29, 2.2.11 and 3.0.4 includes a fix for CVE-2020-9402: Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/04/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20 |
show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | <3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7 |
show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.0a1,<3.0.13 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.7 , <2.2.19 |
show Django versions 2.2.19, 3.0.13 and 3.1.7 include a fix for CVE-2021-23336: Web cache poisoning via 'django.utils.http.limited_parse_qsl()'. Django contains a copy of 'urllib.parse.parse_qsl' which was added to backport some security fixes. A further security fix has been issued recently such that 'parse_qsl(' no longer allows using ';' as a query parameter separator by default. |
| Django | 2.2.1 | >=3.1a1,<3.1.10 , >=2.2a1,<2.2.22 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.2 |
show Django versions 3.2.2, 3.1.10 and 2.2.22 include a fix for CVE-2021-32052: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
pyup-update-django-2.2.1-to-4.1.2
2 years, 11 months ago
Update django from 2.2.1 to 4.1.2
mkdocs 1.0.4, pylint 2.3.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.
| Package | Installed | Affected | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | >=0,<1.2.3 |
show Mkdocs 1.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2021-40978: Built-in dev-server allows directory traversal using the port 8000, enabling remote exploitation to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the vendor doesn't agree this is a security flaw. "It should be mentioned the dev server is known to not be secure and should not be used in a sensitive environment. The security flaw is using the dev-server in an unsafe way, e.g., as a public server and not just as a development server." |
| mkdocs | 1.0.4 | <1.3.0 |
show Mkdocs 1.3.0 fixes an XSS vulnerability which was present when using the search function in built-in themes. https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/commit/5cf196361bb0f8364f667ed98888ffa064982efa |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | >=0,<2.6.1 |
show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.13.0 |
show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322 |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.7.0 |
show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e |
| pylint | 2.3.1 | <2.5.0 |
show Pylint 2.5.0 no longer allows ``python -m pylint ...`` to import user code. Previously, it added the current working directory as the first element of ``sys.path``. This opened up a potential security hole where ``pylint`` would import user level code as long as that code resided in modules having the same name as stdlib or pylint's own modules. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.6 |
show Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker who controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <2.11.3 |
show This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the '_punctuation_re regex' operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.5 |
show A vulnerability in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker who can control both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, bypassing Jinja's sandbox protections. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the ability to manipulate both the template's filename and its contents. The risk depends on the application's specific use case. This issue affects applications that render untrusted templates where the attacker can determine the template filename, potentially leading to severe security breaches. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.4 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. |
| Jinja2 | 2.10.1 | <3.1.3 |
show Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show Urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 2.2.0 and before 2.5.0, urllib3 does not control redirects in browsers and Node.js. urllib3 supports being used in a Pyodide runtime, utilizing the JavaScript Fetch API or falling back on XMLHttpRequest. This means Python libraries can be used to make HTTP requests from a browser or Node.js. Additionally, urllib3 provides a mechanism to control redirects, but the retries and redirect parameters are ignored with Pyodide; the runtime itself determines redirect behaviour. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <2.5.0 |
show urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Prior to 2.5.0, it is possible to disable redirects for all requests by instantiating a PoolManager and specifying retries in a way that disable redirects. By default, requests and botocore users are not affected. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable. This issue has been patched in version 2.5.0. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.17 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.17 and 2.0.5 include a fix for CVE-2023-43804: Urllib3 doesn't treat the 'Cookie' HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a 'Cookie' header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.5 |
show Urllib3 1.26.5 includes a fix for CVE-2021-33503: When provided with a URL containing many @ characters in the authority component, the authority regular expression exhibits catastrophic backtracking, causing a denial of service if a URL were passed as a parameter or redirected to via an HTTP redirect. https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q2q7-5pp4-w6pg |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.25.9 |
show Urllib3 1.25.9 includes a fix for CVE-2020-26137: Urllib3 before 1.25.9 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF control characters in the first argument of putrequest(). NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2020-26116. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83784 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/1800 |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | >=1.25.2,<=1.25.7 |
show The _encode_invalid_chars function in util/url.py in the urllib3 library 1.25.2 through 1.25.7 for Python allows a denial of service (CPU consumption) because of an inefficient algorithm. The percent_encodings array contains all matches of percent encodings. It is not deduplicated. For a URL of length N, the size of percent_encodings may be up to O(N). The next step (normalize existing percent-encoded bytes) also takes up to O(N) for each step, so the total time is O(N^2). If percent_encodings were deduplicated, the time to compute _encode_invalid_chars would be O(kN), where k is at most 484 ((10+6*2)^2). See: CVE-2020-7212. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <=1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<=2.2.1 |
show Urllib3's ProxyManager ensures that the Proxy-Authorization header is correctly directed only to configured proxies. However, when HTTP requests bypass urllib3's proxy support, there's a risk of inadvertently setting the Proxy-Authorization header, which remains ineffective without a forwarding or tunneling proxy. Urllib3 does not recognize this header as carrying authentication data, failing to remove it during cross-origin redirects. While this scenario is uncommon and poses low risk to most users, urllib3 now proactively removes the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects as a precautionary measure. Users are advised to utilize urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to handle the Proxy-Authorization header securely. Despite these precautions, urllib3 defaults to stripping the header to safeguard users who may inadvertently misconfigure requests. |
| urllib3 | 1.25.3 | <1.26.18 , >=2.0.0a1,<2.0.7 |
show Affected versions of urllib3 are vulnerable to an HTTP redirect handling vulnerability that fails to remove the HTTP request body when a POST changes to a GET via 301, 302, or 303 responses. This flaw can expose sensitive request data if the origin service is compromised and redirects to a malicious endpoint, though exploitability is low when no sensitive data is used. The vulnerability affects automatic redirect behavior. It is fixed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7; update or disable redirects using redirects=False. This vulnerability is specific to Python's urllib3 library. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <23.0.0 |
show Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <22.0.0 |
show Gunicorn fails to properly validate Transfer-Encoding headers, leading to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) vulnerabilities. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <21.2.0 |
show A time-based vulnerability in Gunicorn affected versions allows an attacker to disrupt service by manipulating the system clock, causing premature worker timeouts and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. The issue stems from the use of time.time() in the worker timeout logic, which can be exploited if an attacker gains the ability to change the system time. |
| gunicorn | 19.9.0 | <19.10.0 , >=20.0.0,<20.0.1 |
show Gunicorn 20.0.1 fixes chunked encoding support to prevent http request smuggling attacks. https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/issues/2176 https://github.com/p4k03n4t0r/http-request-smuggling#request-smuggling-using-mitmproxy-and-gunicorn |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <65.3.0 |
show Affected versions of allauth are vulnerable to account enumeration through timing attacks (CWE-203). This vulnerability allows attackers to determine the existence of user accounts by measuring response times during email/password authentication attempts. The issue resides in the AuthenticationBackend._authenticate_by_email method, which did not mitigate timing discrepancies. Exploitation can be performed remotely with high feasibility. Users should update to the latest version of allauth to apply the implemented timing attack mitigations. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.47.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.47.0 adds a new setting 'SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET' that controls whether or not the endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is 'False'. This is useful to prevent redirect attacks. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.3 |
show Affected versions of Django-allauth are vulnerable to CSRF and replay attacks in the SAML login flow. RelayStatewas used to keep track of whether or not the login flow was IdP or SP initiated. As RelayState is a separate field, not part of the SAMLResponse payload, it was not signed, causing the vulnerability. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.63.6 |
show In Django-allauth, a vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the login page when configuring the Facebook provider to use the `js_sdk` method, potentially compromising user sessions or stealing sensitive information. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.54.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.54.0 includes a security fix: Even when account enumeration prevention was turned on, it was possible for an attacker to infer whether or not a given account exists based upon the response time of an authentication attempt. |
| django-allauth | 0.39.1 | <0.41.0 |
show Django-allauth 0.41.0 conforms to the general Django 3.0.1, 2.2.9, and 1.11.27 security release. See CVE-2019-19844 and <https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/18/security-releases/>. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.15.2 |
show Affected versions of the package djangorestframework are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags. |
| djangorestframework | 3.9.4 | <3.11.2 |
show A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come from user input. This allows a user who can control those strings to inject malicious <script> tags, leading to a cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
Python 3 badge
URL
https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/python-3-shield.svg
Markdown
[](https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/)
Restructured Text
.. image:: https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/python-3-shield.svg
:target: https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/
:alt: Python 3
HTML
<a href="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/"><img src="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg" alt="Python 3" /></a>
Textile
!https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/python-3-shield.svg(Python 3)!:https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/
RDoc
{<img src="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/python-3-shield.svg" alt="Python 3" />}[https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/]
pyup.io badge
URL
https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg
Markdown
[](https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/)
Restructured Text
.. image:: https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg
:target: https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/
:alt: Updates
HTML
<a href="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/"><img src="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg" alt="Updates" /></a>
Textile
!https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg(Updates)!:https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/
RDoc
{<img src="https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/shield.svg" alt="Updates" />}[https://pyup.io/repos/github/helpec/app-backend/]