Safety CI > Narshe1412/Code-Institute-Public-Projects

Docs | Support

Narshe1412/Code-Institute-Public-Projects

Requirements Safety CI

pyup-update-virtualenv-20.0.31-to-20.11.0

3 years, 7 months ago

8dcee06d

Update virtualenv from 20.0.31 to 20.11.0

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 7 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-lazy-object-proxy-1.6.0-to-1.7.1

3 years, 8 months ago

14f34157

Update lazy-object-proxy from 1.6.0 to 1.7.1

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 7 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-lazy-object-proxy-1.6.0-to-1.7.1

3 years, 8 months ago

a429e1b3

Update lazy-object-proxy from 1.6.0 to 1.7.1

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 7 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-lazy-object-proxy-1.6.0-to-1.7.0

3 years, 8 months ago

67dd2521

Update lazy-object-proxy from 1.6.0 to 1.7.0

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 7 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-lazy-object-proxy-1.6.0-to-1.7.0

3 years, 8 months ago

4de197fa

Update lazy-object-proxy from 1.6.0 to 1.7.0

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 7 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

snyk-fix-da6e8c2bb85ae05640089351ebf9f6a8

3 years, 8 months ago

9af7cc4c

fix: project-django-blog/requirements.txt to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

snyk-fix-1d41fbb8e24415832f9f98533d9e5d36

3 years, 8 months ago

b64fadb0

fix: project-django-todo/requirements.txt to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

snyk-fix-73264c18b55ef4c75a0563de1c1fec1b

3 years, 8 months ago

12b0dca2

fix: learning-django-auth/requirements.txt to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities

pylint 2.6.0, Pillow 8.1.1 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-django-3.2.3-to-4.0

3 years, 8 months ago

2bb65303

Update django from 3.2.3 to 4.0

pylint 2.6.0, Pillow 8.1.1 and 4 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-django-3.2.3-to-4.0

3 years, 8 months ago

27033aaa

Update django from 3.2.3 to 4.0

pylint 2.6.0, Pillow 8.1.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-django-3.2.3-to-4.0

3 years, 8 months ago

5538060c

Update django from 3.2.3 to 4.0

pylint 2.6.0, Pillow 8.1.1 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

snyk-fix-03ce6b85a443761cbc3534f417cd4541

3 years, 8 months ago

793aca2d

fix: project-django-todo/requirements.txt to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

snyk-fix-207164ab1c4b85b2e568d806329df333

3 years, 8 months ago

7e8ccb20

fix: project-django-blog/requirements.txt to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities

Django 3.2.3, pylint 2.6.0 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-pylint-2.6.0-to-2.12.2

3 years, 8 months ago

a0e08bd1

Update pylint from 2.6.0 to 2.12.2

Django 3.2.3, Pillow 8.1.1 and 5 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

pyup-update-pylint-2.6.0-to-2.12.2

3 years, 8 months ago

3371036d

Update pylint from 2.6.0 to 2.12.2

Django 3.2.3, Pillow 8.1.1 and 6 other dependencies have known security vulnerabilities.

Package	Installed	Affected	Info
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 ensures JpegImagePlugin stops at the end of a truncated file to avoid Denial of Service attacks. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5921 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc
Pillow	8.1.1	>=0,<8.2.0	show An issue was discovered in Pillow before 8.2.0. PSDImagePlugin.PsdImageFile lacked a sanity check on the number of input layers relative to the size of the data block. This could lead to a DoS on Image.open prior to Image.load.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=2.5.0,<10.0.1	show Pillow 10.0.1 updates its C dependency 'libwebp' to 1.3.2 to include a fix for a high-risk vulnerability. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.0.1.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 excludes carriage return in PDF regex to help prevent ReDoS. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5912 https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/43b800d933c996226e4d7df00c33fcbe46d97363
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow before 9.0.1 allows attackers to delete files because spaces in temporary pathnames are mishandled.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25288: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_gray_i. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28678: For BLP data, BlpImagePlugin did not properly check that reads (after jumping to file offsets) returned data. This could lead to a DoS where the decoder could be run a large number of times on empty data. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28678-fix-blp-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22815: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.1	show Pillow 9.0.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A first patch was issued for version 9.0.0 but it did not prevent builtins available to lambda expressions. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.1.html#security
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28676: For FLI data, FliDecode did not properly check that the block advance was non-zero, potentially leading to an infinite loop on load. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28676-fix-fli-dos
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-25287: There is an out-of-bounds read in J2kDecode, in j2ku_graya_la. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-25287-cve-2021-25288-fix-oob-read-in-jpeg2kdecode
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.0.0	show Pillow 9.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2022-22816: path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-imagepath-path-array-handling
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.3.0	show Pillow 8.3.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-34552: Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (also known as Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.3.0	show Pillow 10.3.0 introduces a security update addressing CVE-2024-28219 by replacing certain functions with strncpy to prevent buffer overflow issues.
Pillow	8.1.1	>=5.2.0,<8.3.2	show Pillow from 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/9e08eb8f78fdfd2f476e1b20b7cf38683754866b https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.2.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<9.2.0	show Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data (Data Amplification).
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is potentially vulnerable to DoS attacks through PIL.ImageFont.ImageFont.getmask(). A decompression bomb check has also been added to the affected function.
Pillow	8.1.1	<8.2.0	show Pillow version 8.2.0 includes a fix for CVE-2021-28677: For EPS data, the readline implementation used in EPSImageFile has to deal with any combination of \r and \n as line endings. It used an accidentally quadratic method of accumulating lines while looking for a line ending. A malicious EPS file could use this to perform a DoS of Pillow in the open phase, before an image was accepted for opening. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQHA5HAIBOYI3R6HDWCLAGFTIQP767FL/ https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/5377 https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.2.0.html#cve-2021-28677-fix-eps-dos-on-open
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.2.0	show Pillow is affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. If an attacker has control over the keys passed to the environment argument of PIL.ImageMath.eval(), they may be able to execute arbitrary code. https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/10.2.0.html
Pillow	8.1.1	<10.0.0	show Pillow 10.0.0 includes a fix for CVE-2023-44271: Denial of Service that uncontrollably allocates memory to process a given task, potentially causing a service to crash by having it run out of memory. This occurs for truetype in ImageFont when textlength in an ImageDraw instance operates on a long text argument. https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/7244
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a directory-traversal vulnerability in the Storage.save() method. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class that overrides the generate_filename() method without replicating the file path validations existing in the parent class could allow for directory traversal via certain inputs when calling save(). This could enable an attacker to manipulate file paths and access unintended directories.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2,<5.2.2 , >=5.0a1,<5.1.10 , <4.2.22	show An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.25 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.11 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.3	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential regular expression denial-of-service (REDoS). django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and truncatewords_html template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a username enumeration vulnerability caused by timing differences in the django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method. This method allowed remote attackers to enumerate users through a timing attack involving login requests for users with unusable passwords. The timing difference in the authentication process exposed whether a username was valid or not, potentially aiding attackers in gaining unauthorized access.
Django	3.2.3	>=5.2.0,<5.2.1 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.9 , <4.2.21	show An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags().
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Affected versions of Django has a potential SQL injection vulnerability in the QuerySet.values() and QuerySet.values_list() methods. When used on models with a JSONField, these methods are susceptible to SQL injection through column aliases if a crafted JSON object key is passed as an argument.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are affected by a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in the django.utils.html.urlize() function. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters were susceptible to a denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing many brackets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A security vulnerability has been discovered in certain versions of Django, affecting the password reset functionality. The PasswordResetForm class in django.contrib.auth.forms inadvertently allowed attackers to enumerate user email addresses by exploiting unhandled exceptions during the email sending process. This could be done by issuing password reset requests and observing the responses. Django has implemented a fix where these exceptions are now caught and logged using the django.contrib.auth logger, preventing potential information leakage through error responses.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.16 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.8 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.2	show In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression.
Django	3.2.3	>=3.0.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2.0a1,<3.2.4 , <2.2.24	show Django 2.2.24, 3.1.12, and 3.2.4 include a fix for CVE-2021-33571: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+). https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28346: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.21 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.11 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential Denial of Service via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters in django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri().
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show Django 2.2.27, 3.2.12 and 4.0.2 include a fix for CVE-2022-23833: Denial-of-service possibility in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django addresses a memory exhaustion issue in django.utils.numberformat.floatformat(). When floatformat receives a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent, it could lead to excessive memory consumption. To prevent this, decimals with more than 200 digits are now returned as-is.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.19 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.9 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.1	show Django 4.2.1, 4.1.9 and 3.2.19 include a fix for CVE-2023-31047: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45115: UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.18 , >=5.0.0,<5.0.11 , >=5.1.0,<5.1.5	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service attack due to improper IPv6 validation. The lack of upper limit enforcement for input strings in clean_ipv6_address, is_valid_ipv6_address, and the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field allowed attackers to exploit overly long inputs, causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability is addressed by defining a max_length of 39 characters for affected form fields. The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field was not impacted. Users should upgrade promptly.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.16 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.9 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.1	show A potential denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Django's urlize() and urlizetrunc() functions in django.utils.html. This vulnerability can be triggered by inputting huge strings containing a specific sequence of characters.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45116: An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.17 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.9 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.6	show Django 3.2.17, 4.0.9 and 4.1.6 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23969: In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.14 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.6	show Django 3.2.14 and 4.0.6 include a fix for CVE-2022-34265: Potential SQL injection via Trunc(kind) and Extract(lookup_name) arguments. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Django affected versions are vulnerable to a potential SQL injection in the HasKey(lhs, rhs) lookup on Oracle databases. The vulnerability arises when untrusted data is directly used as the lhs value in the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup. However, applications using the jsonfield.has_key lookup with the __ syntax remain unaffected by this issue.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.18 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.10 , >=4.1a1,<4.1.7	show Django 4.1.7, 4.0.10 and 3.2.18 include a fix for CVE-2023-24580: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in file uploads. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/feb/14/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.25 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.10 , >=3.1a1,<3.1.14	show Django versions 2.2.25, 3.1.14 and 3.2.10 include a fix for CVE-2021-44420: In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.17 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.10 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.4	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (DoS) attack in the `django.utils.html.strip_tags()` method. The vulnerability occurs when the `strip_tags()` method or the `striptags` template filter processes inputs containing large sequences of nested, incomplete HTML entities.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.24 , >=4.0a1,<4.2.10 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.2	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to potential denial-of-service in intcomma template filter when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.24 , >=3.0a1,<3.1.12 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.4	show Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jun/02/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.27 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.12 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.2	show The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS.
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.28 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.13 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.4	show Django 2.2.28, 3.2.13 and 4.0.4 include a fix for CVE-2022-28347: A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/apr/11/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<2.2.26 , >=3.0a1,<3.2.11 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.1	show Django 2.2.26, 3.2.11 and 4.0.1 include a fix for CVE-2021-45452: Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jan/04/security-releases/
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.20 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.13 , >=5.1a1,<5.1.7	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service in django.utils.text.wrap(). The django.utils.text.wrap() and wordwrap template filter were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.23 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.13 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.7	show Django 4.2.7, 4.1.13 and 3.2.23 include a fix for CVE-2023-46695: Potential denial of service vulnerability in UsernameField on Windows. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/nov/01/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.15 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.8	show Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in django.utils.html.urlize() and AdminURLFieldWidget. The urlize and urlizetrunc functions, along with AdminURLFieldWidget, are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks when handling inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters.
Django	3.2.3	<4.2.14 , >=5.0a1,<5.0.7	show Affected versions of Django are potentially vulnerable to denial-of-service via the get_supported_language_variant() method. This method was susceptible to a denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. Exploiting this vulnerability could cause significant delays or crashes in the affected application, potentially leading to service disruption.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.22 , >=4.0a1,<4.1.12 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.6	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via django.utils.text.Truncator. The django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232.
Django	3.2.3	>=4.0a1,<4.1.10 , >=4.2a1,<4.2.3 , <3.2.20	show Affected versions of Django are vulnerable to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) in EmailValidator and URLValidator via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs.
Django	3.2.3	<3.2.15 , >=4.0a1,<4.0.7	show Django 3.2.15 and 4.0.7 include a fix for CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/aug/03/security-releases
Django	3.2.3	>=3.1a1,<3.1.13 , >=3.2a1,<3.2.5	show Django versions 3.1.13 and 3.2.5 include a fix for CVE-2021-35042: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/jul/01/security-releases/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/02/2 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce
pylint	2.6.0	>=0,<2.6.1	show Pylint before 2.6.1 is susceptible to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability due to issues in its pyreverse component. This issue arises from certain regular expressions in pyreverse that can be exploited by causing catastrophic backtracking, significantly slowing down the service by forcing it to take a disproportionate amount of time to process inputs. This vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted inputs that increase the processing time exponentially, potentially leading to a service becoming inaccessible to legitimate users. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
pylint	2.6.0	<2.13.0	show Pylint 2.13.0 fixes a crash when using the doc_params extension. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/5322
pylint	2.6.0	<2.7.0	show Pylint 2.7.0 includes a fix for vulnerable regular expressions in 'pyreverse'. https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/commit/5405dd5115d598fa69e49538d50ec79202b1b52e
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.3	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are vulnerable to Path Traversal (CWE-22) on Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11. The safe_join() function failed to properly detect certain absolute paths on Windows, allowing attackers to potentially access files outside the intended directory. An attacker could craft special paths starting with "/" that bypass the directory restrictions on Windows systems. The vulnerability exists in the safe_join() function which relied solely on os.path.isabs() for path validation. This is exploitable on Windows systems by passing paths starting with "/" to safe_join(). To remediate, upgrade to the latest version which includes additional path validation checks. NOTE: This vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems running Python versions below 3.11 where ntpath.isabs() behavior differs.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-23934: Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like '=value' instead of 'key=value'. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like '=__Host-test=bad' for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie '=__Host-test=bad' as __Host-test=bad'. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-px8h-6qxv-m22q
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<=2.3.7 , >=3.0.0,<3.0.1	show Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	==3.0.0 , <2.3.8	show Werkzeug 3.0.1 and 2.3.8 include a security fix: Slow multipart parsing for large parts potentially enabling DoS attacks. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/b1916c0c083e0be1c9d887ee2f3d696922bfc5c1
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<3.0.6	show Affected versions of Werkzeug are potentially vulnerable to resource exhaustion when parsing file data in forms. Applications using 'werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser' to parse 'multipart/form-data' requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds.
Werkzeug	2.0.1	<2.2.3	show Werkzeug 2.2.3 includes a fix for CVE-2023-25577: Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses 'request.data', 'request.form', 'request.files', or 'request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)', it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/security/advisories/GHSA-xg9f-g7g7-2323

older