Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to improper handling of response header variation when SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST is set to True. When a session is not modified during a request cycle, Django's session middleware fails to include the Set-Cookie header in the Vary response header, causing caching intermediaries to store and serve responses that carry session cookies to subsequent users who request the same cached resource. A remote attacker who causes a victim user to visit a cached public page can steal the user's session cookie, enabling session hijacking.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Information Disclosure due to erroneous caching behaviour in the django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware component. The middleware incorrectly caches responses for requests where the Vary header contains an asterisk (*), which, per the HTTP specification, signals that the response should not be cached under any conditions, resulting in private user data being stored in the shared cache backend. An attacker who accesses a cached page can retrieve private response data that was intended only for the original authenticated user.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to improper enforcement of the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when processing ASGI requests with missing or understated Content-Length headers. The ASGI request handler does not correctly account for the discrepancy between the declared Content-Length value and the actual data volume received, allowing request bodies that exceed the configured memory limit to be buffered entirely in memory.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to unbounded request-body allocation when reading HttpRequest.body for ASGI requests whose Content-Length header is missing or understates the actual payload size. The body-reading path relies on the declared Content-Length to enforce the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE cap, so an ASGI request that omits Content-Length or advertises a smaller value than the payload being streamed bypasses the limit check and reads the full incoming body into memory. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this against a Django application served over ASGI by sending a request without Content-Length or with an understated value, causing the server to load an arbitrarily large request body into memory and exhaust available resources on the host.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity in MultiPartParser when handling multipart upload parts that declare Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 and include excessive whitespace. The parser normalises and decodes the base64 body of each part without bounding the volume of interstitial whitespace, so processing time grows disproportionately with the amount of attacker-supplied whitespace embedded in the encoded payload, reaching a pathological worst case under crafted input. An authenticated remote attacker able to submit multipart uploads can exploit this by including large amounts of whitespace inside a base64-encoded part to consume excessive CPU during request parsing, degrading availability of the Django application.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to GenericInlineModelAdmin failing to validate add permissions on inline model instances when processing forged POST data on admin change forms. When the admin changes view handles inline formsets backed by GenericInlineModelAdmin, new inline rows submitted in the POST payload are persisted without verifying that the requesting user holds add permission on the target inline model, so the add-permission check is effectively skipped for generic inline relationships. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a parent model but lacks add permission on an associated generic-inline model can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data containing additional inline rows, creating new instances of the inline model and resulting in unauthorised record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization due to the admin changelist view processing forged POST data against a ModelAdmin that defines list_editable without enforcing that submitted rows correspond only to existing records a user is permitted to edit. The changelist form handling is under ModelAdmin.list_editable accepts form entries whose primary key values do not match any existing row and creates new instances from them, treating the inline edit endpoint as an implicit create path that bypasses the add-permission check. An authenticated admin user who holds change permission on a model exposed via list_editable but lacks add permission can exploit this by submitting crafted POST data to the changelist endpoint to create new instances of that model, resulting in unauthorized record creation within the Django admin.

Affected versions of the Django package are vulnerable to HTTP Header Spoofing due to ambiguous normalisation of request header names in ASGIRequest, where two distinct on-the-wire header variants that differ only in underscore versus hyphen separators collapse to the same internal key. When Django builds the request META mapping for an ASGI request, a header such as X-Forwarded-For and a client-supplied X_Forwarded_For are both mapped to the single underscore form, so an attacker-controlled header can overwrite or masquerade as a trusted header set by a fronting proxy or middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending an HTTP request containing an underscore-separated header name that collides with a trusted hyphenated header to spoof values relied on by downstream middleware or application code, such as forwarded-client or authentication-related headers, leading to authentication bypass and integrity impact.